This Week's Featured Artifact:
New York Times Friday, May 2, 1941 Edition
New York Times Friday, May 2, 1941 Edition
As is often true of the pieces I collect, our
first exhibit item in this virtual museum represents those seemingly mundane
items that can reveal an important moment in history…
Late spring and War has not yet come to America, although it dominates the front-page
headlines of the New York Times and foreshadows our coming involvement. Enlarged
typescript touting “Washington Shifts Fifty Oil Tankers to British Service,”
“Thrifty Patriots Wait in Line to Buy Bonds for Defense,” “British ask U.S. Aid
on War Blacklist” and others must have brought an unsettled pang in the bellies
of readers populating morning streets, offices and homes. The Times and its ilk
were still the main source of information, especially if one wanted more than a
sound bite’s worth of detail.
I acquired
an original copy of this particular edition, not because of my fascination with
the seeds of World War II, but for what appeared on page 25, in the Amusements
section. 1941 was a banner year for films. This week was a landmark. Stars such
as James Stewart, Lawrence Olivier, Judy Garland, Vivien Leigh, Henry Fonda,
Barbara Stanwick, and more graced the screens in this one un-unique week of
options for moviegoers. Fantasia was
in its sixth month of a marathon run and Ziegfeld
Girl was starting just its second week at the Capitol Theater. More than
any of that, on this day, a in-depth review of a film that had premiered the
night before graced page 25. It is this historical bookmark that moved me to
purchase this artifact.
Citizen Kane is widely recognized as the greatest
American film, if not simply the greatest film, ever made.
I was 19
years old before I had ever seen Citizen
Kane; and then, not by choice but by
obligation. This film, as well as A Clockwork
Orange, created the centerpiece of an undergraduate film class I took to
fill requirements in a less painful manner. While I was overwhelmed by the
techniques that made each film so powerful, I was totally mesmerized by the
former. I admired Kubrick’s success in developing empathy for the demonic main
character in making Clockwork so
powerful, but that brilliance was overshadowed by it being so disturbing.
Welles used a
bottomless well of cinematic devices—lighting, blocking, editing, acting, music,
scenery, and so on—to create what is nearly a perfect work of monochromatic art.
The Times reviewer detailed its accomplishments, as well as the minor flaws
that keep it from realizing pure perfection. The review is insightful, interesting
for its timing, and worth the read. To do so, click here for a GigaPan version
of the page you can enlarge. If you’ve never seen this American film treasure,
rent it or catch it at the next classic film fest. Or see it again, after
reading the review. Like the accompanying advertisement boasts, “Now you know,
it’s terrific!” Actually, it’s much more than that.

No comments:
Post a Comment